I disagree. This video explains it exactly and directly deals with the question you posted.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bathe87kNFU&feature=player_embedded#
You can watch the other parts if you wish. Do not forget that the "fire" case was given as an example after the judged asked for one in a case where two Yiddish speaking individuals spread anti-war pamphlets during WWI.
People have the right to say anything about everything and that includes religion, government, prophets, business, etc.
________________________________
"well,that's it...america is pretty much a hypocritical country...it says it is afree country and has a constitution thats says so...but then you look and see people getting lawsuits for critisizing this and that and you don't see gays getting married (which is a good thing...i don't support gay marriage)...anyway,they say they are a free country,but they ARENT..there is no such this as a PURE free country....those drunk first presidents were in la la land when they wrote the constitution thinking they can achieve a free country..."
ohh shut up and stop hating the West .... America has never said they are perfect. America is working torwards having freedom for everybody and that is what it is: A WORK IN PROGRESS
ohh and whether you agree with it or not gays will soon be able to marry .... it is just inevitable
_________________________________
"
But if, while I am being heckled, I shout "fire!: or "gun!" and cause a stampede to the door, that's not protected speech. "
Then what about spreading anti-war pamphlets? Could those not be dangerous as well?
SHOUTING FIRE IN A THEATER SHOULD BE FINE, BECAUSE WHO DECIDES WHAT IS DANGEROUS SPEECH AND WHAT ISN'T?