Ok I may have an answer....
A couple months before the incident of 9/11 happened, I read an article saying that Islam was the fastest spreading religion in the world, and in 50 years from that point Europe would be an all Islamic continent if Islam continued to grow as fast. Then 9/11 happened and all this hate started to come from the terrorists claiming to be Muslims. I don't know if these are related, but if they are, I believe I know why....
Islam advocates for equality and peace among men of all races and of both genders. The extremely rich (which happen to be in control of the media) would be outraged at the rules of Islam because they would feel not in much power anymore (of course they would still be rich, but they would have to pay 2.5% of their salary a year for charity, and many [I AM NOT SAYING ALL OF THE RICH ARE LIKE THIS] of them wouldn't like that). I believe that the media is portraying Islam in a bad way because of this reason...
...and for others too. Remember back when America invaded Iraq (another Muslim country) on grounds that they had nuclear weapons? And 10 years later the president said "we were mislead to believe that they had nuclear weapons"? One, America killed thousands, many millions, of their people and all we say is pretty much "we made a mistake"? Two, before the war, 100% of all oil deposits in Iraq belonged to Iraq. After the war, only 18% remained to them and the other 72% belonged to America. So we invaded Iraq on untrue grounds and then we say "whoops" then we are still there occupying their oil. And after all this, Islam in portrayed evilly (in this case) because Iraq supposedly had nuclear weapons....
...and Iraq is not the only case of this. Let's go to Afghanistan: Iraq had oil, and Afghanistan has drug plantations (I don't know which drug, or if its legal or not. Go do research on your own). A couple years before the war on Afghanistan, the government there shut down those plantations, and a lot of money was lost to the owners of it (which I believe were American, or lived in America, and are super rich, as most drug owners are whether legal or not). Suddenly, America finds out that the terrorist group Al-Quada is there. So they wage war in Afghanistan and they are still there with no trace of the terrorist group (except they thankfully killed Osama-bin-Laden). I don't know if they are related, but if they are, then the above statements make sense...
[Before I continue, I need to make something perfectly clear: violence is not ok unless peace talks will not work. But violence in cold blood is not ok. All the Terrorist groups that "Fight in the name of Islam" CANNOT be Muslim, because Islam advocates for peace, not violence or terrorism (read the Quran if you don't believe me). And another thing: Islam does not believe in killing anyone who doesn't follow their beliefs: there is an entire chapter towards the end of the Quran that says "You have you belief, and I have mine." This implies that you leave them alone if they don't believe what you believe. So these groups that fight in the name of Islam really don't. They fight in the name of terrorism, that is, if what the media says is true...]
...but there is more. Israel wanted their country to be an all-Jewish community. So they invade Israel and put the Palestinians in prison camps (not explicitly said, but they live in cramped quarters with barbed walls, and that sounds like a prison camp to me). Then when people started protesting saying what Israel is doing is wrong, suddenly Hamas springs out of no where and they claim it is a terrorist group that somehow got past the barbed walls and the security around it and they are terrorists because they can somehow kill people through the Iron Dome system of Israel. In my opinion, I think Hamas is a group trying to fight against the Israel occupation. So back to Hamas springing out of no where: this gives grounds for a full invasion of Israel's Palestinians, and Israel just happens to be one of America's allies...
...and my last point: ISIS. This group I am 50% sure with. They could be terrorist, they couldn't, I won't know.... except for what the media says. But with the above statements, I find my self conflicted: is ISIS really terrorist, or is a powerful country after something in the Middle East (which happens to be an extremely populated region with a lot, and I mean A LOT of resources)? Notice how when ISIS moves through the Arab countries, the American army follows, and taking control of the countries they pass through? (This part may not be true; again I will say this: I am not sure about this one but I can't really trust the media; I have way too many Muslim friends that their manners and beliefs contradict the negativity that the media portrays).
To conclude this tiring response, I will say this: do not take what I have said and believe it immediately. Look into the points I have raised before responding back and research it. You never know, I might have mixed up the dates. There is a lot of negativity towards Muslims, and I believe this is all because of the extremely rich that are in charge of all countries and the media just don't want Islam to spread and undermine their power, but again, the media might be correct (although you can't ignore the fact that America has control over 72% of Iraq's oil deposits). If you have thoughts against this, please read the Quran and confirm your beliefs with it, then bring me the verses in it that say that Islam is barbaric. If you blindly believe everything everyone has told you, you can be used just like that. You need to do our own research.
Happy New Year!