sameer s
2008-05-14 06:55:51 UTC
I invite everyone to examine and ponder upon verse 42:23 (Ayah Muwaddat) of al-Qur'an al-Majeed
"That is of which Allah gives the good news to His servants, (to) those who believe and do good deeds. Say: I do not ask of you any AJR (wage/reward) for it but love for FIL-QURBA; and whoever earns good, We give him more of good therein; surely Allah is Forgiving, Grateful." (42:23)
("fil-Qurba") means "those near of kin" or "close relatives". But there is a deeper reality which this verse points to.
Some Sunni commentators have given the Tafseer of this verse that the kinship means the kinship between the Prophet and the disbelievers of Quraish, merely to hide the true meaning and implication of this beautiful Ayah. Let us examine the Tafseer of 13th century Sunni exegete, ibn Kathir.
ibn Kathir gives the Tafseer of this verse as follows:
"(Say: "No reward do I ask of you for this except to be kind to me for my kinship with you.")
Means, 'Say, O Muhammad, to these idolators among the disbeliever of Quraysh: I do not ask you for anything in return for this message and sincere advice which I bring to you. All I ask of you is that you withhold your evil from me and let me convey the Messages of my Lord.. If you will not help me, then do not disturb me, for the sake of the ties of kinship that exist between you and I." - Tafseer ibn Kathir
Therefore, ibn Kathir is of the opinion that this verse was revealed to tell the polytheists among the Quraish to at least leave Rasoolullah (a.s.) alone if they weren't going to accept Islam. This interpretation, therefore, means that if the disbelievers weren't going to accept Islam, then they should at least allow the Prophet to continue his ministry and they should love him for the reason that he had family members amongst them. This interpretation can also be found in Tafseer al-Jalalayn by Jalal al-din al-Suyuti and Jalal al-din al-Mahalli.
This interpretation is objectionable on many grounds. First of all, the Qur'an explicitly states that Allah does not accept the love of the disbeliever in 60:4, when Hazrat Ibrahim (a.s.) is praised by Allah when he tells the people that hate and enmity are between him and the disbelievers forever until they accept Allah. Allah praises him and says that there is a "goodly pattern for you in Abraham and those with him". How, then, can ibn Kathir suggest that Allah is telling the Quraishi disbelievers to love the Prophet when the fact is that Allah does not accept the love of disbelievers?
Secondly, the word اجر ("AJR"), which means "reward/wage/recompense", truly indicates that this sort of "wage" is given in return for the Prophet's guidance of mankind and his service to humanity. The Prophet is not asking for "ajr" from the disbelievers for his kinship with them. How can you ask for "ajr" for just being a relative, for the verse says: "I do not ask you a wage for it", and this "it" is not the kinship, but the guidance of his Prophethood! But how can the disbelievers among the Quraish give a reward for something that has affected them only negatively from their viewpoint? This clause can only be complete if these disbelievers believed in the message and were guided to Islam, but we find that this is not the case, because according to ibn Kathir, this verse is referring to the disbelievers to give recompense to the Messenger, and they had not been guided yet. There remains that difficulty which ibn Kathir has not expounded further. Also, this proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that this verse is speaking to the believers, and not the disbelievers.
The third objection is, as you will appreciate later, that the wage cannot refer to anything which will benefit the Prophet. Because of these three objections, we cannot accept ibn Kathir's tafseer.
In order to understand this Ayah, we must examine other Ayahs which further elucidate the meaning of "ajr". I have chosen a few of them, but there many more which are similar in meaning:
Say: "No AJR (wage/reward) do I ask of you for it except that who wants to may take a path to his Lord" (25:57)
We find here in 25:57 that the only "ajr" (wage/reward) is that we take ourselves to the Sirat al-Mustaqeem, the Straight Path unto the Lord. Therefore, those which are the "fil-Qurba" in 42:23 must be EQUAL to the Straight Path to the Lord. These are none other than the "close kin" of the Prophet, or more specifically, Ahlul'bayt. Also, this "ajr" only affects us, and not the Prophet, for the Qur'an says:
"Say: Whatever AJR (wage/reward) I have asked of you, that is for yourselves; surely my AJR (wage/reward) is with Allah, and He is a witness of all things." (34:47)
We find here in 34:47 that the wage unto the Prophet is only from Allah. We realize through this verse that the "ajr" is only beneficial to us, and not Rasoolullah. When we reconcile this verse with 42:23, we come across the reality that "fil-Qurba" refers to those whom we must be guided by in order to be led to the Sirat al-Mustaqeem.
"Say: I do not ask you for any AJR (wage/reward) for it; it is nothing but a reminder to the nations." (6:90)
If you read Ayahs 88-89 before reading this one, the reminder is the message of the Prophet (a.s.). The Qur'an is commanding the people to follow the guidance that was given to them by Rasoolullah (a.s.).
Look at it like this: Allah says in 25:57 that the only "ajr" is that we take to the Straight Path. In Verse of Muwaddat, He says that it is love of Ahlul'bayt. There can be no conflict or contradiction in the Qur'an. Therefore, Ahlul'bayt are equal to the Sirat al-Mustaqeem, and that they are the way unto the Straight Path that Allah is talking about in 25:57. They are also equal to the reminder in 6:90, and are therefore the reflections of the Sirat al-Mustaqeem. When Allah says LOVE FOR FIL-QURBA, he is speaking about the same category of love that belongs to him, because when we say we LOVE Allah, we love him in the sense that we blend with His commands and we follow him unconditionally. This is the sort of LOVE being described in 42:23, otherwise the rest of the Ayahs will contradict each other and will not make any sense to a rational mind.
There can only be one conclusion, and that "fil-Qurba" in the Verse of Muwaddat refers only to the Ahlul'bayt, whom are the guides of mankind and are the ones whom Allah commands us to follow so that we should be on the Right Path. The Caliphate belongs only to those who can guide mankind, and it is evidence in this discourse that only Ahlul'bayt are worthy of being guides unto mankind. Also, this verse challenges the belief of the Ahlul'sunnah that the Ahlul'bayt are not infallible. Is there a way that the Sirat al-Mustaqeem is fallible? Therefore, how can those who are defined as the Sirat al-Mustaqeem in these verses be considered as mere fallibles like you and I? The fact remains that only the pure and sinless can truly take you to Allah. The purity and infallibility of Aal'Muhammad is also shown in many verses, including the Verse of Mubahila (3:61) and the Verse of Purification (33:33).
Most Sunni scholars have accepted that 42:23 was revealed for Ahlul'bayt (a.s.).
Alhumdulillah, through this exposition, it is clear that the Ahlul'bayt are the straightest path to the Lord of the Worlds. In Surah al-Fatiha, when we say "Guide us to the straight path, the path of those you hath bestowed favors upon," this is in reference to none other than the Ahlul'bayt (a.s.). I ask you now: Who can be more worthy of leadership than Aal'Muhammad (a.s.)?
Salawat alla Muhammad wa Aale Muhammad!